On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's January 12,
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
For the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in Spitzley v. Spitzley, 477 Mich. 989,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.