U.S. v. STEIN

No. S1 05 Crim. 0888(LAK).

495 F.Supp.2d 390 (2007)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 16, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Hillebrecht, Rita M. Glavin, Kevin M. Downing, Margaret Garnett, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney, David Spears, Spears & Imes LLP, Craig D. Margolis, Vinson & Elkins LLP, for Defendant Jeffrey Stein.

Michael J. Madigan, Robert H. Hotz, Jr., Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, for Defendant John Lanning.

Robert S. Fink, Caroline Rule, Fran Obeid, Kostelanetz & Fink, LLP, for Defendant Richard Smith.

Stanley S. Arkin, Joseph V. DiBlasi, Elizabeth A. Fitzwater, Arkin Kaplan Rice LLP, for Defendant Jeffrey Eischeid.

Ronald E. DePetris, Marion Bachrach, DePetris & Bachrach, LLP, for Defendant Philip Wiesner.

Steven M. Bauer, Karli E. Sager, Latham & Watkins, LLP, for Defendant John Larson.

David C. Scheper, Overland Borenstein Scheper & Kim LLP, for Defendant Robert Pfaff.

John R. Wing, Lankier Siffert & Wohl LLP, Diana D. Parker, Law Offices of Diana D. Parker, for Defendant Larry DeLap.

John F. Kaley, Doar Rieck Kaley & Mack, for Defendant Steven Gremminger.

Cristina C. Arguedas, Ted W. Cassman, Michael W. Anderson, Arguedas, Cassman & Headley, LLP, Ann C. Moorman, Law Offices of Ann C. Moorman, for Gregg Ritchie.

George D. Niespolo, Stephen H. Sutro, Duane Morris LLP, for Defendant Randy Bickham.

Michael S. Kim, Leif T. Simonson, Kobre & Kim LLP, Attorneys for Defendant Mark Watson.

James R. DeVita, Bryan Cave LLP, John A. Townsend, Townsend & Jones LLP, for Defendant Carol Warley.

Russell M. Gioiella, Richard M. Asche, Litman, Asche & Gioiella, LLP, for Defendant Carl Hasting.

Susan R. Necheles, Hafetz & Necheles, for Defendant Richard Rosenthal.

Richard M. Strassberg, David B. Pitofsky, Goodwin Procter LLP, for Defendant David Greenberg.


OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

                                 Table of Contents
  I.  Introduction .........................................................394
 II.  The Factual Bases of the Court's Constitutional Holdings .............394
      A.  The Thompson Memorandum ...........................................395
          1.  The Text .......................................................396
          2.  The Bar's Understanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases