RIALTO POLICE BENEFIT ASS'N. v. CITY OF RIALTO

No. E039649.

66 Cal.Rptr.3d 714 (2007)

155 Cal.App.4th 1295

RIALTO POLICE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF RIALTO, Defendant and Appellant; County of San Bernardino, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

October 3, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Robert A. Owen, Robert A. Owen, Oxnard, and Kathy M. Gandara; Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai, Jeffrey Sloan and Jonathan V. Holtzman, San Francisco, for Defendant and Appellant.

Lackie & Dammeier, Michael D. Lackie, Michael A. Morguess and Dieter C. Dammeier, Upland, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson and Arthur A. Hartinger, Oakland, for Amicus Curiae League of California Cities.


OPINION

HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case presents an issue of first impression: Is a city's decision to enter into a contract with the county sheriff for law enforcement services, rather than continue to provide such services through the city's own police department, subject to the meet and confer requirements of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov.Code, § 3500 et seq....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases