1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 174 P.3d
  5. 174 P.3d 587 (2007)
 

BOISE CASCADE CORP. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY

932018; A126743.

174 P.3d 587 (2007)

216 Or. App. 338

BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Respondent, v. STATE of Oregon, by and through BOARD OF FORESTRY, Defendant-Respondent Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 5, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip D. Chadsey argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the opening brief were Charles F. Adams and Stoel Rives LLP. With them on the reply brief was Michael B. Hallinan, Portland.

Denise G. Fjordbeck, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent-cross appellant. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Brendan C. Dunn, Assistant Attorney General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and CARSON, Senior Judge.

BREWER, C.J.

This inverse condemnation case comes to us with a substantial procedural history, an account of which is set out below. Following trial after the latest remand, a jury determined that the state had taken Boise Cascade Corporation's property in violation of the Fifth Amendment by temporarily prohibiting logging and that Boise should be compensated in the amount of $25. Boise appeals and the Oregon Board of Forestry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases