Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the petitioner, the father of a child born out of wedlock, failed to establish that his child's interest will be substantially promoted by changing the child's surname to his and that there is no reasonable objection to the proposed name change (see Matter of David Robert T.,
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.