MUMMAGRAPHICS, INC. v. CRO, INC.

No. 103,648.

158 P.3d 501 (2007)

2007 OK CIV APP 28

MUMMAGRAPHICS, INC., d/b/a Webguy Internet Solutions, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CRO, Inc., d/b/a El Chico Mexican Café, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

As Corrected May 10, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Menzer, Menzer Law Offices, P.C., Blackwell, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

John F. Heil, III, Karissa K. Cottom, Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C., Tulsa, OK, and Christian S. Huckaby, Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant/Appellee.


Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

OPINION

ADAMS, Judge.

¶ 1 Mummagraphics, Inc., doing business as Webguy Internet Solutions (Webguy), argues the trial court erred in denying its own motion for summary judgment and in granting the motion for summary judgment of CRO, Inc., doing business as El Chico Mexican Café (CRO), claiming CRO was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases