PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. The evidence was discovered after defendant was detained for allegedly violating a condition of probation that he refrain from knowingly associating with persons who use or possess illegal controlled substances. The state concedes that the record contains no evidence...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.