PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant argues that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding by clear and convincing evidence that he suffers from a mental disorder that renders him unable to provide for his basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). On the merits, the state concedes that the evidence is insufficient to justify appellant's involuntary commitment. The state argues, however, that appellant never objected to the sufficiency of the evidence...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.