1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 919 A.2d
  5. 919 A.2d 845 (2007)
 

IN RE OPINION 39 OF THE COMMITTEE ON ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

919 A.2d 845 (2007)

190 N.J. 250

In re OPINION 39 OF the COMMITTEE ON ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. Jon-Henry Barr, Esq., Glenn A. Bergenfield, Esq., Carey B. Cheifitz, Esq., Maria Delgaizo Noto, Esq. Andrew J. Renda, Jr., Esq., and John S. Voynick, Esq., Petitioners. Key Professional Media, Inc., (d/b/a "Super Lawyers" and "Law & Politics"), Intervenor-Petitioner. Stuart A. Hoberman, Esq., Petitioner, v. Committee on Attorney Advertising, Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

March 23, 2007.

These matters having come before the Court pursuant to Rule 1:19A-3(d) on petitions for review of Opinion 39 of the Committee on Attorney Advertising,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the petitions for review are granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the matter is summarily remanded to retired Appellate Division Judge Robert A. Fall to sit as a Special Master for limited purpose of developing, on an expedited basis, an evidentiary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases