1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 917 A.2d
  5. 917 A.2d 734 (2007)
 

SOTO v. SCARINGELLI

917 A.2d 734 (2007)

189 N.J. 558

Maria SOTO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lisa SCARINGELLI and James Scaringelli, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 21, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott L. Puro, Trenton, argued the cause for appellants (Backes & Hill, attorneys; Mr. Puro and Robert C. Billmeier, on the brief).

Albert P. Mollo, argued the cause for respondent.

Justice RIVERA-SOTO delivered the opinion of the Court.

New Jersey's compulsory automobile insurance statutory scheme distinguishes between those who seek recovery for economic loss — "uncompensated loss of income or property, or other uncompensated expenses, including, but not limited to, medical expenses[,]" N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2k — and those who seek recovery for nonecomonic loss — that is, loss for "pain, suffering and inconvenience[,]"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases