STATE v. PETERSON

No. 05-349.

923 A.2d 585 (2007)

2007 VT 24

STATE of Vermont v. James PETERSON.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

April 6, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Quinn, Addison County State's Attorney, and Christopher E. Perkett, Deputy State's Attorney, Middlebury, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew F. Valerio, Defender General, and Kelly Green, Appellate Defender, Montpelier, for Defendant-Appellant.

Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ.


¶ 1. DOOLEY, J.

The issue in this case is the scope of the exclusionary rule in criminal cases, specifically, whether physical evidence obtained as a result of a violation of defendant's Miranda rights must be excluded at trial. We conclude that under the Vermont Constitution, Chapter I, Article 10, and the Vermont exclusionary rule, physical evidence obtained in violation of Miranda rights must be suppressed. We reverse in part and remand.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases