1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 924 A.2d
  5. 924 A.2d 465 (2007)
 

SHIM v. RUTGERS

924 A.2d 465 (2007)

191 N.J. 374

Ezrina SHIM, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RUTGERS-The State University of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 14, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gavin J. Rooney, Roseland, argued the cause for appellant (Lowenstein Sandler PC, attorneys; Mr. Rooney and Kathleen A. Walsh, on the briefs).

H. Justin Park argued the cause for respondent (Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Cherry Hill, attorneys).

Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

In 2003, eighteen-year-old Ezrina Shim applied for admission to Rutgers University (Rutgers) for the fall term. At the time, she had lived in New Jersey for four years and therefore was presumed, under N.J.S.A. 18A:62-4, to be a domiciliary for the purpose of in-state tuition. Under Rutgers' reading of the applicable administrative regulation, N.J.A.C. 9A:5-1.1(f), Shim was subject to a counter-presumption...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases