1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 520 F.Supp.2d
  5. 520 F.Supp.2d 589 (2007)
 

CHIN v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.

Civil Action No. 95-5569(JCL).

520 F.Supp.2d 589 (2007)

David CHIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

May 15, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allyn Zissel Lite, Bruce D. Greenberg, Lite, Depalma, Greenberg and Rivas, LCC, Newark, NJ, Paul J. Linker, Gruhin & Gruhin, Esqs., Nutley, NJ, Brian Hufford, Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Thomas R. Curtin, Graham, Curtin & Sheridan, PC, Morristown, NJ, for Defendant.

OPINION

LIFLAND, District Judge.

I. Background

On November 8, 2006, the Court ruled that the 25 California-citizen Plaintiff's in this action are entitled to attorneys' fees under California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 from Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("Chrysler"). See Chin v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., No. 95-5569, slip op. at 7, 43-44 (D.N.J. Nov. 8, 2006). The factual and procedural history of the case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases