SEMA v. AUTOMALL 46 INC.


894 A.2d 77 (2006)

384 N.J. Super. 145

Zefkiser A. SEMA and Merita Sema, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. AUTOMALL 46 INC., Nissan 23, Nissan 46 Mitsubishi, Defendants-Appellants, and John Corino, Frank Esposito, and Julio Maldonado, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 24, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Bennett, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Betsch and Bennett, attorneys, Teaneck; Mr. Bennett, on the brief).

Donald J. Maizys, argued the cause for respondents (Feitlin, Youngman, Karas & Youngman, attorneys, Fair Lawn; Mr. Maizys, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, FUENTES and GRAVES.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRAVES, J.A.D.

On August 5, 2000, plaintiff Zefkiser A. Sema (Sema)3 agreed to purchase a 2000 Nissan Altima automobile from Automall 46, Inc. (Automall).4 According to Sema, the Automall salesperson told her that the vehicle she ultimately purchased was a new car that had been driven for only ten miles. In addition, all the documents defendant provided to plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases