On January 10, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the February 25, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal and direct the parties to specifically brief and argue the applicability...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.