1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 626 S.E.2d
  5. 626 S.E.2d 210 (2006)
 

STATE v. SWARTZ

No. A05A2081.

626 S.E.2d 210 (2006)

277 Ga. App. 241

The STATE v. SWARTZ.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

January 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Dana J. Norman, Jesse D. Evans, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellant.

Freedman & Sinowski, Thomas C. Sinowski, Atlanta, for appellee.

RUFFIN, Chief Judge.

After the Superior Court Sentence Review Panel reduced the sentence for Christopher Swartz, the State moved to set aside the new sentence, alleging it was void. The trial court denied the motion, and the State appeals. Specifically, the State argues that the reduction order is void because the statutory scheme permitting for the reduction of sentences is unconstitutional. In the alternative, the State argues that the Sentence Review Panel exceeded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases