1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 407 F.Supp.2d
  5. 407 F.Supp.2d 401 (2006)
 

VICTOR G. REILING ASSOCIATES v. FISHER-PRICE

No. 3:03 CV 222(JBA).

407 F.Supp.2d 401 (2006)

VICTOR G. REILING ASSOCIATES AND DESIGN INNOVATION, INC., Plaintiffs, v. FISHER-PRICE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 10, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund J. Ferdinand, III, Jessica Lee Elliott, Grimes & Battersby, Norwalk, CT, Jay H. Sandak, Peter M. Nolin, Sandak Hennessey & Greco, Stamford, CT, Richard E. MaClean, Paul & Bayer, Wilton, CT, for Plaintiffs.

Bradford S. Babbitt, Michael J. Kolosky, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, CT, Jacqueline D. Bucar, Robert W. Allen, Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, New Haven, CT, Jodyann Galvin, Robert W. Allen, Hodgson Russ LLP, Buffalo, NY, William E. Wallace, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCoy, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

Russell D. Dize, Grimes & Battersby, Norwalk, CT.

Ruling on Defendant's Motion in Limine # 6 Concerning the Admissibility of Evidence Related to Settlement [Doc. # 177]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

In part two of the instant Motion, defendant Fisher-Price seeks to preclude the remaining plaintiff in this case, Design Innovation ("DI"), from offering at trial any evidence of settlement negotiations, arguing that such evidence is (1) inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 408, and (2) inadmissible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases