1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 430 F.Supp.2d
  5. 430 F.Supp.2d 366 (2006)
 

COMMISSARIAT A. L'ENERGIE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

No. CIV.A. 03-484-KAJ.

430 F.Supp.2d 366 (2006)

COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE, Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; Sharp Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation; and Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

April 18, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Kirk, The Bayard Firm, Wilmington, DE, Gaspare J. Bono, Lora A. Brzezynski, Pro Hac Vice, for Plaintiff.

William J. Marsden, Jr., Sean Paul Hayes, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Richard L. Horwitz, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Neil P. Sirota, Pro Hac Vice, Josy W. Ingersoll, Karen Elizabeth Keller, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Gerard M. O'Rourke, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE, for Defendants.

REDACTED MEMORANDUM ORDER

JORDAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a patent infringement case. The plaintiff is Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique ("CEA"), a French government agency. The defendants are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("Samsung"), a Korean corporation; Sharp Corporation ("Sharp"), a Japanese corporation; AU Optronics Corporation ("AU"), a Taiwanese corporation; and Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation ("CMO"), another Taiwanese...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases