1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 410 F.Supp.2d
  5. 410 F.Supp.2d 292 (2006)
 

DOUGLAS v. U.S.

No. M8-85 (LBS). No. C-03-4518.

410 F.Supp.2d 292 (2006)

Neal M. DOUGLAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 25, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hector Gonzalez, Charles Hurley, Daniel Dumezich, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, New York, NY, for Movants.

David S. Jones, W. Carl Hankla, Joseph A. Sergi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Defendant.

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

Before the Court is a motion by third-party petitioners ("movants") to quash subpoenas issued by the United States in the underlying action. The movants are eleven individuals whose financial records have been subpoenaed from Deutsche Bank.1 The movants assert that the Right to Financial Privacy Act ("RFPA"), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422 (2005), prohibits these subpoenas because there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases