1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 143 P.3d
  5. 143 P.3d 538 (2006)
 

ATKINSON v. BOARD OF PAROLE

(CA A122599; SC S52476).

143 P.3d 538 (2006)

341 Or. 382

David Lee ATKINSON, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided September 21, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Lee Atkinson, pro se, Ontario, filed the briefs for petitioner.

Steven R. Powers, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, Salem.

Jamesa J. Drake, Deputy Public Defender, Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, Salem, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services.

CARSON, J.

In this case, we must decide what constitutes a "substantial question of law" when the Court of Appeals determines whether to grant a motion for leave to proceed with judicial review of a parole order under ORS 144.335. Petitioner sought judicial review of a decision of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) and, pursuant to ORS 144.335(6),1 filed such a motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases