1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 142 P.3d
  5. 142 P.3d 486 (2006)
 

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY v. LANE COUNTY

2005-082; A132091.

142 P.3d 486 (2006)

207 Or. App. 500

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY, an unincorporated association, Philip Ziebert, Adam Novick, and Maureen Hudson, Respondents, v. LANE COUNTY, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 30, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen L. Vorhes, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Lane County Office of Legal Counsel.

Daniel J. Stotter, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Bromley Newton LLP.

Before LINDER, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and DEITS, Judge pro tempore.

DEITS, J. pro tempore.

Lane County seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision remanding the county's approval of a special use permit for a firearms training facility for further proceedings consistent with LUBA's understanding of ORS 197.770. We reverse and remand LUBA's decision.

Before addressing the merits of the county's challenge to LUBA's decision, we consider whether the county has standing to bring this review proceeding. If the county...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases