VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] The Appellant contends that the district court erred in revoking his probation because the State failed to carry its burden of proving that he acted willfully. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] The Appellant states the issue simply as being whether the trial court erred in revoking his probation. In his brief, however, he raises two separate questions:
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.