PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE; SBC OHIO, INTERVENING APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted October 25, 2005.
Decided June 28, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., Philip F. Downey, and Stephen M. Howard, for appellant and cross-appellee Payphone Association of Ohio.
Bailey Cavalieri, L.L.C., William A. Adams, and Dane Stinson; and Jon F. Kelly and Mary Ryan Fenlon, for cross-appellant and intervening appellee SBC Ohio.
Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Duane W. Luckey, Thomas G. Lindgren, and Werner L. Margard III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
Thompson Hine, L.L.P., Thomas E. Lodge, and Carolyn S. Flahive, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Telecom Association.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
PFEIFER, J.
INTRODUCTION
{¶ 1} Appellant and cross-appellee, Payphone Association of Ohio ("PAO"), and cross-appellant and intervening appellee, SBC Ohio,1 appeal as of right from orders of appellee Public Utilities Commission of Ohio ("PUCO") that establish rates charged by SBC Ohio to its competitors for pay-phone services. We conclude that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
