PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of second-degree escape. ORS 162.155. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on a choice of evils defense and in imposing a departure sentence based on a finding that defendant had been persistently involved in similar offenses. We reject without discussion defendant's arguments concerning the choice of evils defense. On the sentencing issue, defendant argues that, under...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
