1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 145 P.3d
  5. 145 P.3d 242 (2006)
 

STATE v. MILES

0301-30579; A122283.

145 P.3d 242 (2006)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Ronald Jay MILES, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Susac, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Peter Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Legal Services Division, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services.

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and, BREWER, Chief Judge, and LINDER, Judge.

LINDER, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the admission of certain hearsay statements at defendant's criminal trial violated his confrontation rights under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.1 The state concedes that, under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), and Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases