1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 894 A.2d
  5. 894 A.2d 1229 (2006)
 

SOTO v. SCARINGELLI

894 A.2d 1229 (2006)

384 N.J. Super. 431

Maria SOTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lisa SCARINGELLI and James Scaringelli, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 11, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert P. Mollo, attorney for appellant.

Backes & Hill, attorneys for respondents (Scott L. Puro, Trenton, on the brief).

Before Judges CONLEY, WEISSBARD and WINKELSTEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEISSBARD, J.A.D.

In this personal injury case arising under the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act of 1998 (AICRA), we are called on to determine the meaning of "significant scarring," one of the means of crossing the verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8a, and the circumstances under which that category is subject to resolution by summary judgment.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases