1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 894 A.2d
  5. 894 A.2d 1080 (2006)
 

BARRY v. LITCHFIELD HISTORIC DIST. COM'N

No. CV-04 0092641S.

894 A.2d 1080 (2006)

49 Conn.Sup. 498

Ann Fay BARRY v. BOROUGH OF LITCHFIELD HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION.

Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Litchfield.

January 11, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cramer & Anderson, Litchfield, for the plaintiff.

Law Offices of James Stedronsky, Litchfield, for the defendant.

PICKARD, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, Ann Fay Barry, has brought this appeal from the denial by the defendant, the borough of Litchfield historic district commission (the commission), of an application for a certificate of appropriateness. For the reasons subsequently given, the appeal must be sustained.

II

AGGRIEVEMENT

General Statutes § 7-147i provides in pertinent part: "Any person or persons severally or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases