1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 50 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 50 Cal.Rptr.3d 135 (2006)
 

AGUIAR v. CINTAS CORP. NO. 2

No. B182477.

50 Cal.Rptr.3d 135 (2006)

144 Cal.App.4th 121

Hermelinda AGUIAR et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Seven.

September 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Rubin & Demain, Fred H. Altshuler, Michael Rubin and Eileen B. Goldsmith, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Claudia McGee Henry, Senior Assistant City Attorney, and Gerald M. Sato, Deputy City Attorney, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Mark C. Dosker, Diane L. Gibson, Michael W. Kelly, San Francisco, Casey J.T. McCoy, Los Angeles, and Yeon Gyo Shuh, for Defendants and Respondents.

PERLUSS, P.J.

Hermelinda Aguiar, Alicia Maria Aldrete, Aurora Banuelos and Maria Alicia Gonzalez (collectively plaintiffs) filed this lawsuit as a putative class action against their employer, Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporation No. 3 (Cintas), for violation of the Los Angeles Living Wage Ordinance (LWO) (Los Angeles Admin. Code, § 10.37 et seq.) and related claims. The trial court denied their motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases