1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 451 F.Supp.2d
  5. 451 F.Supp.2d 1286 (2006)
 

STANLEY v. CONOCOPHILLIPS PIPE LINE CO.

No. 05-cv-02277-CM.

451 F.Supp.2d 1286 (2006)

Angela STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. CONOCOPHILLIPS PIPE LINE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

September 12, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl A. Gallagher, McAnany, Van Cleave & Phillips, P.A., Kansas City, KS, for Plaintiff.

Jill Frost, Franke, Schultz & Mullen, PC, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MURGUIA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Angela Stanley brings this negligence action against defendant Conoco-Phillips Pipe Line Company. The case is now before the court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 47). Defendant asks this court to find that defendant did not owe plaintiff a duty to warn or a duty to train. Because the facts needed to determine whether defendant owed a duty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases