SKOOG v. COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS

Nos. 04-35087, 04-35286, 04-35568.

469 F.3d 1221 (2006)

Daniel SKOOG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS; Mark Fresh, Defendants, and Herbert Royster, Defendant-Appellant. Daniel Skoog, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. County of Clackamas; Mark Fresh; Herbert Royster, Defendants-Appellees. Daniel Skoog, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. County of Clackamas, Defendant-Appellee, and Mark Fresh; Herbert Royster, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed November 20, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Montomery W. Cobb, Cobb & Bosse, LLP, Portland, OR, for plaintiff-appellant-appellee Daniel Skoog.

Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, OR, for defendant-appellant-appellee Herbert Royster.

Edward S. McGlone, Assistant County Counsel, Clackamas County, Oregon City, OR, for defendant-appellee County of Clackamas.

Before BRUNETTI, T.G. NELSON, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.


T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

This set of appeals arises from a single lawsuit that is still ongoing. The district court granted summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity to one of the defendants, Officer Herbert Royster, on all but one claim: the plaintiff's claim that Royster seized his still camera in retaliation for the exercise of his First Amendment rights. In 04-35087, Royster interlocutorily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases