1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 417 F.Supp.2d
  5. 417 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2006)
 

BLOODSWORTH v. SMITH & NEPHEW

No. 2:05CV622-D.

417 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2006)

Mary BLOODSWORTH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SMITH & NEPHEW, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division.

February 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Edward Dutton, Pittman, Hooks, Dutton, Kirby & Hellums PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs.

Alan Daniel Mathis, James C. Barton, Jr., James P. Pewitt, Lee McWhorter Pope, Johnston, Barton, Proctor & Powell, LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants.

ORDER

DE MENT, Senior District Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs Mary and Jerry Bloodsworth's motion to remand in which Plaintiffs assert that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking in this cause which was removed from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama.1 (Doc. No. 9.) For the reasons to follow, the court finds that Plaintiffs' motion is due to be denied.

Previously, the court entered a memorandum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases