1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 459 F.Supp.2d
  5. 459 F.Supp.2d 1142 (2006)
 

VAE NORTRAK NORTH AMERICA v. PROGRESS RAIL SERV.

Civil Action No. 03-AR-1480.

459 F.Supp.2d 1142 (2006)

VAE NORTRAK NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants, v. PROGRESS RAIL SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendant and Counter-Claimant v. Meridian Track Products Corp., et al., Counter-Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Middle Division.

October 25, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Crossan, Chapman & Cutler, Chicago, IL, John E. Getty, Will Hill Tankersley, Jr., Balch & Bingham LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants.

Andrew W. Zeve, John F. Luman, III, Albert B. Kimball, Glenn A. Ballard, Jr., Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, Houston, TX, John G. Thompson, Jr., Samuel H. Franklin, Lightfoot Franklin & White LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant and Counter-Claimant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, JR., District Judge.

Before coming to grips with the motions for summary judgment pending in the above-entitled patent infringement case, the court laments the fact that the House Judiciary Committee did not sooner do what it did on September 13, 2006 (H.R. 5418), namely, approve legislation creating a ten-year pilot program permitting the random assignment of patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases