1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 412 F.Supp.2d
  5. 412 F.Supp.2d 1171 (2006)
 

RODGERS v. CENTRAL LOCATING SERVICE, LTD.

No. C05-1911C.

412 F.Supp.2d 1171 (2006)

George RODGERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CENTRAL LOCATING SERVICE, LTD., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle.

February 1, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Subit, Steven Bert Frank, Frank Freed Subit & Thomas, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs.

Daniel L. Thieme, Littler Mendelson PC, Seattle, WA, for Defendants.

ORDER

COUGHENOUR, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion to remand (Dkt. No. 8) and Defendants' motion to transfer (Dkt. No. 9). The Court has considered the memoranda, declarations, and exhibits submitted by the parties, as well as the allegations in the complaint and notice of removal, and determined that oral argument is not necessary. For the reasons that follow, the Court will GRANT Plaintiffs' motion for remand and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases