1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 445 F.Supp.2d
  5. 445 F.Supp.2d 1104 (2006)
 

VISTO CORP. v. SPROQIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. C-04-0651 EMC. (Docket Nos. 166, 168, and 177).

445 F.Supp.2d 1104 (2006)

VISTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SPROQIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

August 4, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald S. Katz, Greg Travis Warder, Robert D. Becker, Shawn G. Hansen, Eugene L. Hahm, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff.

Theresa K. Hankes, Sri K. Sankaran, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, San Francisco, CA, Bart Torvik, Devan Padmanabham, George Eck, Gerald H. Sullivan, Paul Robbennolt, Todd R. Trumpold, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant.

ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUTION—"WORKSPACE ELMENT" AND "INDEPENDENTLY MODIFIABLE COPY"

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Visto Corporation has sued Defendant Sproqit Technologies, Inc. for infringement of the '192, '708, '131, and '221 patents. The parties submitted ten terms or phrases to the Court for claim construction. A claim construction hearing was held on July 6, 2006. Having considered the parties briefs and accompanying submissions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases