1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 422 F.Supp.2d
  5. 422 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2006)
 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. COMMERCIAL HEDGE

No. 4:04CV3184.

422 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2006)

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. COMMERCIAL HEDGE SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Prime Trading Company, Prime Trading Company, Inc., Lawrence Joseph Volf, PT Holdings, Inc., d/b/a Prime Trading, Sherman County Management, Inc., and Sherman County Bank, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska.

March 30, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan M. Folena, Michael J. Otten, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Bruce A. Smith, Edward H. Tricker, Woods, Aitken Law Firm, Lincoln, NE, Gretchen L. Twohig, Thomas E. Johnson, Baird, Holm Law Firm, Omaha, NE, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

Because the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the Commission) is not barred from seeking restitution from the defendants even though some of the private victims may have entered into settlement agreements with the defendants and received money as a result, I deny the defendants' motions for summary judgment. Briefly, I explain the reasoning for my decision next.

I. BACKGROUND

The Commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases