1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 428 F.Supp.2d
  5. 428 F.Supp.2d 1037 (2006)
 

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF WALNUT CREEK

No. C-05-4723 MMC.

428 F.Supp.2d 1037 (2006)

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a California corporation doing business as AT & T California, Plaintiff and Petitioner v. THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK and The City Council of the City of Walnut Creek, Defendants and Respondents.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 13, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Metzger, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Van Buskirk, Christopher R. Ball, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Bobby C. Lawyer, SBC West Legal Department, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff and Petitioner.

Paul Valle-Riestra, Senior Assistant City Attorney, Walnut Creek, CA, Kirk Edward Trost, Miller, Owen & Trost, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants and Respondents.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR TO ABSTAIN

CHESNEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion filed February 27, 2006 by defendants City of Walnut Creek and the City Council of the City of Walnut Creek (jointly, "City") seeking dismissal, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and/or abstention. Plaintiff Pacific Bell Telephone Company, doing business as AT & T California ("AT & T") has filed opposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases