1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 432 F.Supp.2d
  5. 432 F.Supp.2d 1017 (2006)
 

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. MENDOZA

Nos. CIV.02-1141 PHX ROS, CIV.03-164 PHX ROS.

432 F.Supp.2d 1017 (2006)

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMBILE INSURANCE COMPNY, Plaintiff, v. George MENDOZA, et al. Defendants. George Mendoza, Plaintiff, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

June 2, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Bell, David Bell & Associates PLLC, Floyd P. Bienstock, John Butler Nickerson, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff and Defendants.

Richard S. Oseran, Richard S. Oseran PLLC, Bruce G. MacDonald, McNamara Goldsmith Jackson & MacDonald PC, David J. Diamond, Goldberg & Osborne, Lynne M. Trenery, Tucson, AZ, John C. Belt, Belt & Associates PC, Fountain Hills, AZ, for Defendants and Plaintiff.

Arlinda Fernandez, Mesa, AZ, pro se.

Certification to the Arizona Supreme Court

SILVER, District Judge.

On February 7, 2006, State Farm filed a Motion for Reconsideration; or Alternatively, Motion for Certification of Question to the Arizona Supreme Court. Pursuant to Rule 27, Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, this Court certifies to the Arizona Supreme Court the following issue: whether the duty of equal consideration arises when an insurer in a multiple claimant case has offered to pay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases