MATTER OF RHODANNA C. B.


36 A.D.3d 106 (2006)

823 N.Y.S.2d 497

In the Matter of RHODANNA C.B., Appellant. PAMELA B. et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 31, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Mineola (Sidney Hirschfeld, Felicia B. Rosen and Dennis B. Feld of counsel), for appellant.

RITTER, J.P., and SKELOS, J., concur with MASTRO, J.; LUCIANO, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment insofar as appealed from in a separate opinion.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MASTRO, J.

We hold today that the Supreme Court's appointment of guardians pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 with the authority to consent in perpetuity to the administration of psychotropic medication to their ward, over her objection and without any further judicial review or approval, is inconsistent with the due process requirements of Rivers v Katz (67 N.Y.2d 485 [1986]). Accordingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases