1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 448 F.Supp.2d
  5. 448 F.Supp.2d 908 (2006)
 

F.T.C. v. QT, INC.

No. 03 C 3578.

448 F.Supp.2d 908 (2006)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. QT, INC., Q-Ray Company, Bio-Metal, Inc., Que Te Park, a.k.a. Andrew Q. Park, and Jung Joo Park, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

September 8, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore H. Hoppock, Reille C. Montague, Heather Hippsley, Janet M. Evans, Edward Glennon, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Michael A. Ficaro, Ross E. Kimbarovsky, Richard H. Tilghman, Ungaretti & Harris, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

"The pain just went away." "Within seconds the pain was gone." "You don't have to live with pain."

The Q-Ray® Ionized Bracelet® (Q-"Ray bracelet") achieved tremendous commercial success through a series of 30minute infomercials. The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") brings this action claiming Defendants marketed the Q-Ray bracelet in a deceptive and misleading...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases