1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 442 F.Supp.2d
  5. 442 F.Supp.2d 838 (2006)
 

GENENTECH, INC. v. INSMED INCORPORATION

No. C-04-5429 CW (EMC).

442 F.Supp.2d 838 (2006)

GENENTECH, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. INSMED INCORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

August 10, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Patricia Thayer, Ethan Glass, Heller Ehrman LLP, San Francisco, CA, William G. Gaede, III, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Heidi Strain, David B. Moyer, George C. Best, Larry L. Shatzer, Liane M. Peterson, Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington, DC, E. Patrick Ellisen, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION ON SCOPE AND PROCEDURE OF WILLFULNESS DISCOVERY; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTION TO QUASH OR LIMIT SCOPE OF SUBPOENAS (Docket Nos. 514, 524)

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs have sued Defendants for patent infringement and a declaratory judgment of patent infringement. On July 17, 2006...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases