BROWN-WILBERT v. COPELAND BUHL & CO.

No. A05-1952.

715 N.W.2d 484 (2006)

BROWN-WILBERT, INC., et al., Appellants, v. COPELAND BUHL & CO., P.L.L.P., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 13, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., and George E. Antrim, III, George E. Antrim, III, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Thomas J. Shroyer, Peter A. Koller, Julia M. Dayton, Moss & Barnett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge; DIETZEN, Judge; and HARTEN, Judge.


OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court judgment dismissing its second lawsuit against respondent on res judicata grounds, arguing that the second lawsuit was not precluded because there is no final judgment on the merits in the first lawsuit, the first and second lawsuits involve different causes of action, and they were deprived of a full and fair opportunity to litigate the matter. Respondent argues that the second lawsuit is barred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases