1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 912 A.2d
  5. 912 A.2d 226 (2006)
 

GOODS v. PA BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

912 A.2d 226 (2006)

George GOODS, Appellee, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided December 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victoria Sellitto Freimuth, Esq., Arthur R. Thomas, Esq., for Board of Probation and Parole.

Frederick R. Gutshall, Esq., James M. McClure, Esq., Huntingdon, for George Goods.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

The question presented on appeal is whether the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole ("Board") properly deemed that a state prisoner's failure to challenge the timeliness of an administrative parole revocation hearing1 at the hearing itself constitutes a waiver of the timeliness question under the contemporaneous objection/issue preservation principles animating Dilliplaine v. Lehigh...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases