1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 725 N.W.2d
  5. 725 N.W.2d 375 (2006)
 

GOEMAN v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.

No. A06-425.

725 N.W.2d 375 (2006)

David GOEMAN, et al., Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 19, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Kettering, Jr., Douglas D. McGhee, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Thomas D. McCormick, McCormick Law Office, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by MINGE, Presiding Judge, LANSING, Judge, and KLAPHAKE, Judge.

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellants David and Charlotte Goeman and Trade Lake Mutual Insurance Company (Trade Lake) challenge the grant of summary judgment to respondent Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), determining that under the "closest to the risk" doctrine, Trade Lake was primarily liable for injuries sustained by a child guest who was bitten by the Goemans' dog while at their cabin. On appeal, Trade Lake argues that because both policies were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases