On January 12, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that portion of the judgment of the Court of Appeals that addressed the claim that the trial court erred in holding that public policy did not bar a challenge to plaintiff's enactment of the zoning ordinance. MCR 7.302(G)(1)...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.