Elmira PRESTON, et al.
v.
TENET HEALTHSYSTEM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., et al.
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 21, 2006.
November 21, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Christopher James Bruno, David Scott Scalia, Joseph M. Bruno, Bruno & Bruno, Gerald Edward Meunier, Todd Robert Slack, Gainsburgh, Benjamin, David, Meunier & Warshauer, Roderick Alvendia, Alvendia, Kelly, & Demarest, LLC, Tammie E. Holley, Tammie Holley, LLC, New Orleans, LA, for Elmira Preston, Howard Preston, Rose Lefrance Preston, Sheryl Preston, Deborah Mazie, Anthony Preston, Leonard Preston, Darlene Preston, Cynthia Preston, Angela Nelson, Wanda Preston, Bryan Preston, Tyrone Preston, William Hagstette, Jr., Leroy Lafayette, Roosevelt Lafayette, Fred Lafayette, Eddie Lee Lafayette, Gabriel Lafayette, Samuel Lafayette, Larry Lafayette, Edna Lafayette Newsome, Eola Lafayette Moore, Lillie Lafayette Moore, Robert Hennessey, Rachelle Guillory, Christopher Guillory, Bryan Blackwell, Mark Leblanc, Aster Abraham, Terry Gaines-Oden, Leslie N. Brooks, Evelina Barnes.
Kurt Stephen Blankenship, Gregory Alexis Grefer, Robert I. Baudouin, Blue Williams, L.L.P., Metairie, LA, for Tenet Healthsystem Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Paul G. Preston, Darrin L. Forte, Pamela J. Lormand, Scott P. Yount, Preston Law Firm, LLP, New Orleans, LA, Antonio M. Clayton, Clayton Law Finn, Port Allen, LA, S. Vance Wittie, Wayne Brian Mason, Sedgwick, Detert, Morgan & Arnold, LLP, Dallas, TX, for Lifecare Hospital of New Orleans, L.L.C., Lifecare Management Services, LLC.
David Alva Woolridge, Jr., Carlton Jones, III, Roedel, Parsons, Koch, Blache, Balhoff & McCollister, Baton Rouge, LA, for Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight Board.
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.
ORDER AND REASONS
FALLON, District Judge.
On July 14, 2006, the Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand (Rec.Doc. 15) the above-captioned case to state court. This motion came for hearing with oral argument on August 22, 2006. The Court concluded that more information was needed on the jurisdictional issues and ordered the parties to conduct limited discovery. During the discovery period, however, the Plaintiffs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
