1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 453 F.Supp.2d
  5. 453 F.Supp.2d 584 (2006)
 

STAVOLA v. NORTHEAST UTILITIES

No. 3:05cv998 (JBA).

453 F.Supp.2d 584 (2006)

Jean A. STAVOLA, Plaintiff, v. NORTHEAST UTILITIES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 3, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ian O. Smith, Thomas G. Moukawsher, Moukawsher & Walsh, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff.

Janet Marie Helmke, Northeast Utilities, Hartford, CT, Angela Louise Rubano, Northeast Utilities, Berlin, CT, for Defendants.

PHASE 1 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Because there are two potentially dispositive factual issues in this ERISA case, the Court and the parties agreed that an evidentiary hearing (Phase 1) would be held in lieu of summary judgment motion practice as the more expeditious course. What follows are the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law on these two issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases