On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I dissent from the majority's decision to deny leave. MCL 750.520d(1)(b) provides that a person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.