1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 125 P.3d
  5. 125 P.3d 801 (2005)
 

MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF PROCTOR

15-02-23725; A123045.

125 P.3d 801 (2005)

203 Or. App. 499

In the Matter of the Marriage of John M. PROCTOR, Respondent, and Joyce A. Smith Proctor, Appellant. Joyce A. Smith Proctor, Appellant, v. John Kendall Mavis, Respondent, and Chris Popov, Sandra Meyers, and William Martell Meyers, Third-Party Respondents below.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 28, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Johnson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Johnson Renshaw & Lechman-Su PC.

Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent John M. Proctor. With him on the brief was Greene & Markley, P.C.

Russell Lipetzky argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent John Kendall Mavis.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ROSENBLUM, Judges.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Wife appeals from a judgment of dissolution, assigning error to the trial court's division of property, specifically its award of certain marital assets to husband; its allowance of a "reimbursement" to husband under California law for contributions made to the acquisition of marital assets; its failure to award attorney fees to wife; and its award of attorney fees to respondent Mavis. We conclude that the trial court erred with respect to the property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases