1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 385 F.Supp.2d
  5. 385 F.Supp.2d 514 (2005)
 

CHEMI SPA v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE

No. Civ.A. 04-4545.

385 F.Supp.2d 514 (2005)

CHEMI SPA v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

July 18, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Langer, Langer & Grogan P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Robert S. Silver, Caesar Rivise Bernstein Cohen & Pokotilow, Ltd., Philadelphia, PA, for Chemi Spa.

Jamie B. Bischoff, Eric S. Santoro, Troy Edward Larson, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews and Ingersoll, Philadelphia, PA, John H. Fuson, Timothy C. Hester, Covington & Burling, Washington, DC, for Glaxosmithkline.

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, District Judge.

This is an antitrust action against defendant GlaxoSmithKline ("GSK") for unlawful monopolization pursuant to § 2 of the Sherman Act and § 4 of the Clayton Act. 15 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 15. Before the court is the motion of plaintiff Chemi SpA ("Chemi") for issue preclusion and for partial summary judgment.

I.

On September 27, 2004, Chemi sued GSK for unlawful monopolization of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases