1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 124 P.3d
  5. 124 P.3d 770 (2005)
 

MAHER v. URMAN

No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0039.

124 P.3d 770 (2005)

211 Ariz. 543

Steven A. MAHER, a married man dealing in his sole and separate property, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Michael URMAN and Jane Doe Urman, husband and wife; Lisa Smith and John Doe Smith, wife and husband; and Deconcini, McDonald, Yetwin & Lacy, P.C., an Arizona professional corporation, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

December 20, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Lipartito, Tucson, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Fennemore Craig, By Andrew M. Federhar and Theresa Dwyer, Phoenix, for Defendants/Appellees.

OPINION

PELANDER, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Steven Maher appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his complaint without prejudice for failure to timely serve the defendants/appellees and from the court's denial of his motions for relief pursuant to Rule 60(c), Ariz. R. Civ. P., 16 A.R.S., Pt. 2, and A.R.S. § 12-504, Arizona's savings statute. Finding no error, we affirm.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases